Evolutionary Socialism: socialism: Revisionism and revolution: to socialism, he argued in Evolutionary Socialism (), would be safer than the revolutionary. Evolutionary Socialism [Eduard Bernstein] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Book by Bernstein, Eduard. Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism And Affirmation () [Eduard Bernstein, Edith C. Harvey] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Country:||Turks & Caicos Islands|
|Published (Last):||14 December 2016|
|PDF File Size:||12.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Evolutionary Socialism Edouard Bernstein faced the problem – for Social Democrats – that things did not work out as badly bernstsin predicted in the Communist Manifesto. He was a colleague of Engels, and claimed Engel’s support in dismissing with revolutionism, and calling for an evolutionary socialism, or as it is more commonly called “revisionism”.
PREFACE It has been maintained in a certain quarter that the practical deductions from my treatises would be the abandonment of the conquest of political power by the proletariat organised politically and economically. That is quite an evoolutionary deduction, the accuracy of which I altogether deny.
I set myself against the notion that we have to expect shortly a collapse of the bourgeois economy, and that social democracy should be induced by the prospect of such an imminent, great, social socialismm to adapt its tactics to that assumption.
That I maintain most emphatically. The adherents of this theory of a catastrophe, base it especially on the conclusions of the Communist Manifesto.
This is a mistake in evoolutionary respect. The theory which the Communist Manifesto sets forth of the evolution of modern society was correct as far as it characterised the general tendencies of that evolution. But it was mistaken in several special deductions, above all in the estimate of the time the evolution would take. The last has been unreservedly acknowledged by Friedrich Engels, beernstein joint author with Marx of the Manifesto, in his preface to the Class War in France.
But it is evident that if social evolution takes bsrnstein much greater period of time than was assumed, it must also take upon itself forms and evoputionary to forms that were not foreseen and could not be foreseen then.
Social conditions have not developed to such soialism acute opposition of things and classes as is depicted in the Manifesto. It is not only useless, it is the greatest folly to attempt to conceal this from ourselves. The enormous increase of social wealth is not accompanied by a decreasing number of large capitalists but by an increasing number of capitalists of all degrees.
The middle classes change their character but they do not disappear from the social scale. The process of concentration in agriculture proceeds still more slowly. Trade statistics show an extraordinarily; elaborated graduation of enterprises in regard to size.
No rung of the ladder is disappearing from it. In all advanced countries we see the privileges of sicialism capitalist bourgeoisie yielding step by step to democratic organisations. Under the influence of this, and driven by the movement of the working classes which is daily becoming stronger, a social reaction has set in against the exploiting tendencies of capital, a counteraction which, although it still proceeds evolutionarj and feebly, yet does exist and is always drawing more departments of economic life under its influence.
But the more the political organisations of modern nations are socailism the more the needs and opportunities of great political catastrophes are diminished. He who holds firmly to the catastrophic theory of evolution must, with all his power, withstand and hinder the evolution described above, which, indeed, the logical defenders of that theory formerly did.
But is the conquest of political power by the proletariat simply to be by a political catastrophe? Is it to be the appropriation and utilisation of the power of the State by the proletariat exclusively against the whole non-proletarian world?
He who replies in the affirmative must be reminded of two things. In Marx and Engels announced in the preface to the new edition of the Communist Manifesto that the Paris Commune had exhibited a proof that “the working classes cannot simply take possession of the ready made State machine and set it in motion for their own aims. And he points out in conformity with this opinion that the next task of the party should be “to work for an uninterrupted increase of its votes” or to carry on a slow propaganda of parliamentary activity.
Shall we be told that he abandoned the conquest of political power by the working classes, because he wished to avoid the steady growth of social democracy secured by lawful means being interrupted by a political revolution? If not, and if one subscribes to his conclusions, one cannot reasonably take any offence if it is declared that for a long time yet the task of social democracy is, instead of speculating on a great economic crash, “to organise the working classes politically and develop them as a democracy and to fight for all reforms in the State which are adapted to raise the working classes and transform the State in the direction of democracy.
In short, Engels is so thoroughly convinced that the tactics based on the presumption of a catastrophe have had their day, that he even considers a revision of them necessary in the Latin countries where tradition is much more favourable to them than in Germany. No one has questioned the necessity for the evolutionray classes to gain the control of government. The point eduzrd issue is between the theory of a social cataclysm and bernsteim question whether with the given social development in Germany and the present advanced state of its working classes in the towns and the country, a sudden catastrophe would be desirable in socialsm interest of the social democracy.
I have denied it and deny it again, because in my judgment a greater security for lasting success lies in a steady advance than in the possibilities offered by a catastrophic crash. And as I am firmly convinced that important periods in the development of nations cannot be leapt over I lay the greatest value on the next tasks of social democracy, on the struggle for the political rights of the working man, on the political activity of working men in town and country for the interests of their class, as well as on the work of the industrial organisation of the workers.
Eduard Bernstein – Wikipedia
Even if the word “usually” had not shown that the proposition was only to brnstein understood conditionally, it was obvious that it could not express indifference concerning the final carrying out of socialist principles, but only indifference-or, as it would be better expressed, carelessness – as to the form of the final arrangement of things.
I have at no time had an excessive interest in the future beyond general principles; I have not been able to read to the end any picture of the future. My thoughts and efforts are concerned with the duties of the present and the nearest future, and I only busy myself with the perspectives beyond so far as they give me a line evolutionqry conduct for suitable action bernstin.
The conquest of political power by the working classes, the expropriation of capitalists, are no ends themselves but only means for the evolutionnary of certain aims and endeavours. As such they are demands in the programme of social democracy and are not attacked by me.
Internet History Sourcebooks
Nothing can be said beforehand as to the circumstances of their accomplishment; we can only fight for their realisation. But the conquest of political power necessitates the possession of political rights; and the most important problem of tactics which German social democracy has at the present time to solve appears to me to be to devise the best ways for the extension of the political and economic rights of the German working classes.
This text is part of the Internet Modern History Sourcebook. Dvolutionary Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts for bernsteiin level classes socialis, modern European and World history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.